Comparison of functional outcomes between direct lateral approach and deltopectoral approach in patients with proximal humeral fractures treated by plate osteosynthesis

Vol 28 | Issue 1 | Sep 2018 | page: 8-13 | Sutanu Hazra, Soham Mandal, Anirban Chatterjee, Vikash Kapoor


Authors: Sutanu Hazra[1], Soham Mandal [2], Anirban Chatterjee [1],
Vikash Kapoor [1]

[1] Medica Institute of Orthopedic Sciences, Medica Super
specialty Hospital, Kolkata.
[2] R G Kar Medical College & Hospital, Kolkata.

Address of Correspondence
Dr. Soham Mandal
R G Kar Medical College & Hospital, Kolkata.

E-mail: docsoham1987@gmail.com


Comparison Comparison of functional outcomes between direct lateral approach and deltopectoral approach in patients with proximal humeral fractures treated by plate osteosynthesis

Abstract

Background: Plate osteosynthesis for proximal humeral fractures may be done either by the conventional deltopectoral approach or the direct lateral, deltoid splitting approach. There is sparse literature comparing these two approaches and their functional outcomes.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 71 patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plates (PHILOS®-plate). This is a retrospective study where the first 40 patients were operated using the Deltopectoral approach and the next 31 using the Deltoid splitting or direct lateral approach. Both the groups were comparable in terms of age and gender. Follow up was done at a 1-year interval for both the groups using the ‘Oxford Shoulder Score’.
Result: Duration of surgery and blood loss was found to be significantly lesser in the direct lateral approach group as compared to the Deltopectoral approach group. At 1 year follow up, the Oxford Shoulder Scores were found to be significantly better in the direct lateral group. There was one case of superficial infection and one case of axillary nerve paresis in the direct lateral group and none in the Deltopectoral group. There was one case of superficial infection, one case of plate impingement and one case of early plate removal in the deltopectoral group. Overall patient satisfaction was better in the deltoid splitting group.
Conclusion: The direct lateral approach is a new, safe and effective approach which can be used for fixation of proximal humerus fractures.
Keywords: Proximal humerus fractures, Deltopectoral approach, Deltoid Splitting approach


References

    1. Bartonicek J, Dzupa V, Fric V, et al. [Epidemiology and economic implications of fractures of the proximal femur, proximal humerus, distal radius and fracture-dislocation of ankle]. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur all Gebiete der operative Medizen. 2008;87:213–19. [in German] (Pubmed)
    2. Khmelnitskaya E, Lamont LE, Taylor SA, et al. Evaluation and management of proximal humerus fractures. Adv Orthop. 2012;861598 (Pubmed)
    3. Neer CS., II Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:1077–89.
    4. Brunner F, Sommer C, Bahrs C, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a proximal humeral locked plate: a prospective multicenter analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23:163–72
    5.  Olley LM, Carr AJ. The Use of a Patient-Based Questionnaire (The Oxford Shoulder Score) to Assess Outcome After Rotator Cuff Repair  Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008; 90(4): 326–331.
    1. Nadler SB, Hidalgo JU, Bloch T. Prediction of blood volume in normal human adults. Surgery 1962;51:224-32.
    2. Zlotolow DA, Catalano LW, III, Barron OA, et al. Surgical exposures of the humerus. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:754–65
    3.  Sohn HS , Shin SJ. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for proximal humeral fractures: clinical and radiologic outcomes according to fracture type. ,  J Shoulder and Elbow surgery 2014 Sep;23(9):1334-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.12.018. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
    4. Wu CH, Ma CH, Yeh JJ, et al. Locked plating for proximal humeral fractures: differences between the deltopectoral and deltoid-splitting approaches. J Trauma. 2011;71:1364–70.
    5. Gardner MJ, Griffith MH, Dines JS, Briggs SM, Weiland AJ, Lorich DG. The extended anterolateral acromial approach allows minimally invasive access to the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;(434):123–129.
    6. Acklin YP, Jenni R, Walliser M, Sommer C. Minimal invasive PHILOS®-plate osteosynthesis in proximal humeral fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009;35(1):35–39.
    7. Chlodwigg Kirchoff et al BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008; 9: 138. Outcome analysis following removal of locking plate fixation of the proximal humerus
    8. Gerber C, Werner CM, Vienne P. Internal fixation of complex fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(6):848–855.


How to Cite this Article: Hazra S, Mandal S, Chatterjee A, Kapoor V. Comparison of functional outcomes between direct lateral approach and deltopectoral approach in patients with proximal humeral fractures treated by plate osteosynthesis. International Journal of
Orthopaedic Surgery Sep. 2018;28(1):8-13.

 


(Abstract)      (Full Text HTML)      (Download PDF)


.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *